FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to estimating mass air flow through a throttle of a vehicle, and more particularly to estimating mass air flow based on manifold absolute pressure.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Internal combustion engines (ICE’s) are controlled based on a manifold absolute pressure (MAP) and mass air flow (MAF) signals that are generated by MAP and MAF sensors, respectively. A controller controls emissions and engine performance characteristics of the ICE based on the MAP and MAF signals. For example, critical engine parameters, such as air-to-fuel (A/F) ratio, can be adjusted by knowing the mass of air available for combustion.
MAF sensors are commercially available and have been used with ICE’s to provide the required MAF information. MAF sensors, however, are relatively expensive as compared to other sensors implemented with the ICE. Therefore, alternative techniques for determining MAF into the ICE have developed. Two conventional techniques include a speed density technique and a throttle position technique. The speed density technique determines MAF based on MAP, engine speed and intake air temperature. The throttle position technique determines MAF based on throttle position and engine speed.
Although the conventional techniques eliminate the need for a MAF sensor, they are less accurate than desired. These inaccuracies result from an incorrect estimation of MAF during throttle transient conditions. During throttle transient conditions, a finite amount of time is required to calculate MAF and adjust fuel input. MAF can change dramatically due to the dynamic nature of the ICE during this time. Even during static conditions, the conventional techniques result in cycle-to-cycle measurement variations. More specifically, air flow pulsations that occur as the ICE draws air into the cylinders and delays in processing sensor information result in such cycle-to-cycle variations.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Accordingly, the present invention provides a control system that determines a mass air flow through a throttle of an internal combustion engine (ICE) having an intake manifold. The control system includes a calculator that calculates an estimated mass air flow based on a throttle position and an adaptation module that determines an adjustment value. The adjustment value is based on the estimated mass air flow, an estimated manifold absolute pressure and a measured manifold absolute pressure. A multiplier multiplies the estimated mass air flow by the adjustment value to determine the mass air flow.
In one feature, the control system further includes a calculator that calculates the estimated manifold absolute pressure.
In another feature, the control system further includes an engine speed sensor that generates an engine speed signal and an intake manifold temperature sensor that generates an intake manifold temperature signal. The estimated manifold absolute pressure is based on the engine speed signal and the intake manifold temperature signal.
In another feature, the control system further includes a multiplier that calculates an adjustment input as a product of the estimated mass air flow and a manifold absolute pressure error. The manifold absolute pressure error is determined as a difference between the estimated manifold absolute pressure and the measured manifold absolute pressure.
In still another feature, the adaptation module is an integrator that integrates an adjustment input that is based on the estimated mass air flow and a manifold absolute pressure error. The adaptation module integrates the adjustment input and multiplies the adjustment input by a gain.
Further areas of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description provided hereinafter. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating the preferred embodiment of the invention, are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:
FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of an internal, combustion engine (ICE) system according to the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating mass air flow estimation according to the present invention; and
FIG. 3 is a
flowchart illustrating steps of the mass air flow estimation.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The following description of the preferred embodiments is merely exemplary in nature and is in no way intended to limit the invention, its application, or uses. For purposes of clarity, the same reference numbers will be used in the drawings to identify similar elements. As used herein, the term module and/or device refers to an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), an electronic circuit, a processor (shared, dedicated, or group) and memory that execute one or more software or firmware programs, a combinational logic circuit, or other suitable components that provide the described functionality.
Referring now to FIG. 1, a vehicle 10 includes an internal combustion engine 12 having an intake manifold 14. A throttle 16 regulates air flow into the intake manifold 14. More particularly, a throttle blade 18 is articulated based on a driver input (not shown) to regulate air flow through the throttle 16. The intake manifold 14 directs air flow into cylinders 20 of the engine 12. Although a single cylinder 20 is shown, it can be appreciated that the engine 12 can include multiple cylinders (e.g., 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10 and 12). Air flowing into the cylinders 20 is mixed with fuel and the mixture is combusted therein to drive pistons (not shown) producing drive torque.
A control system regulates operation of the engine based on the sensorless control of the present invention. More specifically, a controller 22 monitors and regulates engine operation based on processing several inputs according to the sensorless control. The controller 22 generally includes software-based processing.
A throttle position sensor 24 generates a throttle position signal (THRPOS) and a manifold absolute pressure (MAP) sensor 26 generates a MAP signal (MAPMEAS), which are received by the controller 22. An intake manifold temperature sensor 28 generates an intake manifold temperature signal (TMAN) and an engine speed sensor 30 generates an engine speed signal (RPM), which are received by the controller 22. An ambient pressure sensor 32 generates an ambient pressure signal (PAMB) that is received by the controller 22. The controller 22 processes the various signals according to the sensorless control and generates at least one command signal based thereon. Engine operation is controlled based on the at least one command signal.
Referring now to FIG. 2, the sensorless control of the present invention will be described in detail. In step 100, control calculates an estimated mass air flow (MAFEST) based on THRPOS. More particularly, a throttle area (ATHROTTHLE) is determined based on THRPOS. ATHROTTLE can be determined from a look-up table based on THRPOS or can be calculated by processing THRPOS through a mathematical model of the throttle 16. MAFEST is calculated based on the following equation:
Control determines an adjusted mass air flow (MAFADJ) based on MAFEST and an adjustment factor (ADJ) in step 102. In step 104, control operates the vehicle based on MAFADJ. More particularly, control can manipulate engine operation parameters based on MAFADJ to produce desired drive torque or emissions.
Control calculates an estimated manifold absolute pressure (MAPEST) based on MAFADJ in step 106. MAFADJ is input into a model of intake manifold filling dynamics to calculate MAPEST. The following is an exemplary equation for the intake manifold filling dynamics:
where: k=current time step; k 1=future time step; MAP(k)=MAPEST (i.e., MAP at current time step); MAP(k 1)=MAPEST (i.e., MAP at future time step); VEFF=volumetric efficiency; VCYL=single cylinder volume VMAN=intake manifold volume; R=gas constant; and NCYL=number of cylinders.
VEFF is a non-linear function that is based on MAP and RPM. Although VEFF is preferably determined from a look-up table stored in memory, it is anticipated that VEFF can be calculated by the controller 22.
In step 108, control calculates a manifold absolute pressure error (MAPERROR) based on MAPEST and MAPMEAS. More particularly, MAPERROR is the difference between MAPEST and MAPMEAS. Therefore, when MAPERROR is zero, MAPEST and MAPMEAS are equivalent. Control determines an adjustment input (ADJINPUT) based on MAPERROR and MAFEST in step 110. ADJINPUT is determined as the product of MAPERROR and MAFEST. In step 112, control determines ADJ based on ADJINPUT. ADJ is preferably determined based on integrating (i.e., summing) ADJINPUT over time and multiplying by a gain. Because the sensorless control is based on a first order system, the gain can be any value without affecting stability. ADJ can be zero, positive or negative. Generally, ADJ will float around zero in the positive and negative regions. If positive, ADJ pushes the manifold filling model higher until MAPERROR is zero. If negative, ADJ pushes the manifold filling model lower until MAPERROR is zero.
Referring now to FIG. 3, the sensorless control is shown in further detail. A calculator 40 calculates MAFEST based on THRPOS, as described above. MAFEST is output to a first multiplier 42 and a second multiplier 44. The first multiplier 42 multiplies MAFEST by ADJ to provide MAFADJ. MAFADJ is output to a controller, such as the controller 22, and a calculator 46. The controller determines at least one command signal based on MAFADJ to operate the vehicle.
The calculator 46 calculates MAPEST based on MAFADJ, as described above. MAPEST is output to a summer 48 that determines MAPERROR based on the difference between MAPEST and MAPMEAS. MAPERROR is output to the second multiplier 44. The second multiplier 44 multiplies MAFEST and MAPERROR to provide ADJINPUT. ADJINPUT is output to an adaptation module 50, which can be provided as an integrator. The adaptation module 50 integrates ADJINPUT to provide ADJ, which is output to the first multiplier 42.
By implementing the sensorless control of the present invention, a MAF sensor can be eliminated. As a result, component count and therefore, component cost and manufacturing costs can be reduced. The sensorless control of the present invention also provides a more robust control system in that MAFADJ is accurate even if the TPS is not functioning properly. This is because the sensorless control is based on the MAP signal.
It is anticipated, however, that the sensorless control of the present invention can be implemented in parallel with a MAF sensor (not shown). More particularly, the sensorless control enhances reliability when implemented in parallel with a MAF sensor. For example, MAFADJ can be compared to the MAF sensor signal to ensure that the MAF sensor signal is rational and that the MAF sensor is functioning properly. Also, the sensorless control can be implemented as a back-up MAF input and vehicle control can be seamless in the event that the MAF sensor becomes inoperative.
Those skilled in the art can now appreciate from the foregoing description that the broad teachings of the present invention can be implemented in a variety of forms. Therefore, while this invention has been described in connection with particular examples thereof, the true scope of the invention should not be so limited since other modifications will become apparent to the skilled practitioner upon a study of the drawings, the specification and the following claims.